|
Post by Mitsuko Lesemeister on Feb 26, 2015 1:19:51 GMT
"The inability to recognize SLANDER, and the inability to act with haste in dispatching it." -upon the word SLANDER she let's out an angered yell-
|
|
|
Post by Vista Major on Feb 26, 2015 1:26:42 GMT
"The inability to recognize SLANDER, and the inability to act with haste in dispatching it." -upon the word SLANDER she let's out an angered yell- You are distraught, Madame? Just let your emotions out in a calmer manner, please. What led to your ability--excuse me, inability--to recognize slander? Did someone use such language towards you specifically or a wider audience?
|
|
|
Post by Mitsuko Lesemeister on Feb 26, 2015 1:29:45 GMT
"Indeed so, that being the defendant. His Factbook was a spit to our region's face, and by extension as president, MY face. Even now I feel resentment, needless to say, the Factbook alongside Unfallious' disrespect for me and my office in the rmb was enough to make me...less than accepting." Pausing, "At the time, the role of president though executive held no executive powers. So his disrespect continued. Even mocking that fact."
|
|
|
Post by Unfallious on Feb 26, 2015 1:31:05 GMT
Objection, your honour, that is conjecture.
|
|
Ruclax
Court Administrator
Posts: 328
WA Member: Yes
CFN Political Party: Liberal Party
|
Post by Ruclax on Feb 26, 2015 1:35:51 GMT
*he looks at the Prosector*
Sustained Mr. Prosector you may keep questioning although do not play on the witnesses emotions. Stay on the point of her side of the story, not her emotions.
|
|
|
Post by Vista Major on Feb 26, 2015 1:36:59 GMT
*he looks at the Prosector*Sustained and duly noted. Mr. Prosector you may keep questioning although do not play on the witnesses emotions. Stay on the point of her side of the story, not her emotions. *nod*Yes, your honor.
|
|
|
Post by Vista Major on Feb 26, 2015 1:39:17 GMT
"Indeed so, that being the defendant. His Factbook was a spit to our region's face, and by extension as president, MY face. Even now I feel resentment, needless to say, the Factbook alongside Unfallious' disrespect for me and my office in the rmb was enough to make me...less than accepting." Pausing, "At the time, the role of president though executive held no executive powers. So his disrespect continued. Even mocking that fact." So, in short, you believe the defendant Unfallious is the cause for the altercation in the Genuan Rebirth? Despite having "held no executive powers", did you do anything within law or reason to end the event?
|
|
|
Post by Mitsuko Lesemeister on Feb 26, 2015 1:43:00 GMT
"I had asked him to remove it, and to apologize for having offended us. He rejected such, and commented against me. Mocking 'What will you do?', the evidence is held in the rmb. Even after I told him that it would hurt our relations, he continued. I said I would withdraw the embassy, but alas... Rebirth Presidents no longer have that power. So, defeated, I withdrew saying nothing else and nothing hateful to our so called ally."
|
|
|
Post by Vista Major on Feb 26, 2015 1:48:00 GMT
"I had asked him to remove it, and to apologize for having offended us. He rejected such, and commented against me. Mocking 'What will you do?', the evidence is held in the rmb. Even after I told him that it would hurt our relations, he continued. I said I would withdraw the embassy, but alas... Rebirth Presidents no longer have that power. So, defeated, I withdrew saying nothing else and nothing hateful to our so called ally." Do you believe that the defendant was within his rights to reject your request to remove the offensive content and "mock" you for such? Do you believe that his alleged disobedience hurt relations between the Genuan Rebirth and the Commonwealth of Free Nations in any formal or informal sense?
|
|
Ruclax
Court Administrator
Posts: 328
WA Member: Yes
CFN Political Party: Liberal Party
|
Post by Ruclax on Feb 26, 2015 1:49:32 GMT
*He turns toward the Witness*
Hold On. I need some clarification.
Madamme, why would you threaten to shut down embassies, or at least relations with the CFN, with such as long and good history, over just one incident like this?
|
|
|
Post by Mitsuko Lesemeister on Feb 26, 2015 1:51:36 GMT
"You are asking me if he has the right? He does have the right to free speech, in his telegrams. Not on rmbs, not in factbooks, and not in dispatches when they endanger relations or causing international incidents. And yes, they were in danger. If not for CFN Founder and Ballarswag, I would have terminated the embassy and formally rebuked Unfallious."
Turning to Ruclax
"Your honor, this is about integrity. Our Region is small and cannot withstand negative publicity. I would have not closed it because of JUST a Factbook, it was also the rudeness of our guest. I take that personally."
|
|
|
Post by Unfallious on Feb 26, 2015 1:52:34 GMT
Objection, your honour, the prosecution calls for speculation. The witness cannot possible be aware of the defendant's rights according to the Commonwealth.
|
|
|
Post by Mitsuko Lesemeister on Feb 26, 2015 1:55:23 GMT
Objection, your honour, the prosecution calls for speculation. The witness cannot possible be aware of the defendant's rights according to the Commonwealth. Incorrect, they are for all to see.
|
|
Ruclax
Court Administrator
Posts: 328
WA Member: Yes
CFN Political Party: Liberal Party
|
Post by Ruclax on Feb 26, 2015 2:00:12 GMT
Overruled. It's not speculation because anyone can read the Laws, which would deem her comment a observation not a conjecture.
The Prosecution may proceed.
|
|
|
Post by Vista Major on Feb 26, 2015 2:03:38 GMT
"You are asking me if he has the right? He does have the right to free speech, in his telegrams. Not on rmbs, not in factbooks, and not in dispatches when they endanger relations or causing international incidents. And yes, they were in danger. If not for CFN Founder and Ballarswag, I would have terminated the embassy and formally rebuked Unfallious." Thank you, your honor. There was an effort to stop the defendant, according to your account. Did Unfallious stop the "harassment" after the CFN Founder and Mr. Ballarswag intervened?
|
|