Ruclax
Court Administrator
Posts: 328
WA Member: Yes
CFN Political Party: Liberal Party
|
Post by Ruclax on Nov 2, 2015 23:15:08 GMT
*Enters Courtroom, sits on chair and Bangs Gavel*Lord Chief Justice's Statement:Right Honourable Lords, the law in question before us today is The Regional Officers Implementation Act. The law, as it's written, is as follows: Article 1: Chancellor and Lord-Chancellor
1. The WA-Delegate, or Chancellor will maintain use of all powers.
2. The Founder, or Lord-Chancellor will maintain use of all powers except for WA.
Article 2: Cabinet
1. The Vice-Chancellor will be give access to Appearance, Border Control, Communications, Embassies, and Polls.
2. The Minister of Defence will be given access to Border Control and Communications.
3. The Minister of Foreign Affairs will be given access to Embassies and Communications.
4. The Minister of Internal Affairs will be given access to Communications and Polls.
5. The Minister of Justice will be given access to Communications.
Article 3: Removal of Powers
1. If any Registered Citizen both Domestic and/or Foreign feels as one of the Cabinet Members excluding the Chancellor has misused their powers, they may call for a vote to remove the Minister's Powers. If the Chancellor and the Chief Justice both approve of calling for a vote, then a Parliament Vote will be held via Regional Poll and a simple majority can remove the Minister's Powers.
As to the Constitutionality of this law, what say you? Yay or Nay? Also, should any citizen, here present, wish to be herd on this matter they may be herd in the Hearing Room.
|
|
|
Post by Humpheria on Nov 4, 2015 19:04:51 GMT
The Lord Justice ponders the question for a long while and eventually leans forward.
"In the matter of the Regional Officers Implementation Act, I concur with my colleague. Nay."
|
|