|
|
Post by Markotovia on Apr 16, 2015 21:37:17 GMT
Political Party Recognition Act
This bill is being Fast-Tracked
This will override Vista's Recognition Bill
Understanding that political parties are one of the most important aspects of the CFN's political landscape Deeply Concerned that there is no current legislation regarding what makes a political party Further Noting that this bill will make Political Parties much more effective and fair. This bill hereby calls for:1. Defines a political party as a group of like-minded people trying to further their beliefs and influence in the CFN;
2. Designates the following criteria for classification as an official CFN Political Party:
a. The party must have at least four (4) members, all of whom must be Members of Parliament (MP),
b. All members of the party must be registered citizens or residents, including the foreign variations of such,
c. The presence of an official Main Page or Headquarters which must contain the following information:
i. Official ideologies of the party,
ii. Goals for the CFN, iii. List of party members
3. Ensures that political parties may act in coalition or merge with other parties;
4. Reaffirms the right of political parties to be allowed to recruit and advertise in the CFN provided that they do not violate the Communications Code;
5. Demands that each political party have one or more persons to ensure organization and cooperation within the parties and Parliament. (e.g. Chairman, Presidium, Triumvirate, etc.);
6. Requires that all parties write a constitution or guideline detailing their governance, membership policy, ideology, etc.;
7. Emphasizes with urgency that all Political Parties currently active in the CFN will be affected by this bill;
8. Declares accordingly Failure to meet these guidelines will result in the termination of "Official Party Status."
ENDORSEMENTS:Markotovia Vista Major Acro WA Fibertas Bearlong Ile-Savoir Ruclax COLDR Jaslandia Everestopia Vladovaskia Sulania DENOUNCEMENTS: |
|
|
|
Post by Vista Major on Apr 16, 2015 21:43:19 GMT
ENDORSED
|
|
|
|
Post by Acro on Apr 16, 2015 21:47:13 GMT
As long as it doesnt give them democracy blocking power I Endorse
|
|
|
|
Post by Markotovia on Apr 16, 2015 21:50:13 GMT
As long as it doesnt give them democracy blocking power I Endorse Not sure what you mean? |
|
|
|
Post by Fibertas on Apr 16, 2015 21:55:11 GMT
ENDORSED
|
|
|
|
Post by Bearlong on Apr 16, 2015 21:57:54 GMT
Some grammatical notes concerning formatting and phrasing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Markotovia on Apr 16, 2015 22:19:11 GMT
Some grammatical notes concerning formatting and phrasing. Noted. So do you endorse? |
|
|
|
Post by Bearlong on Apr 16, 2015 22:35:43 GMT
ENDORSE | APPROUVER
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladovaskia on Apr 16, 2015 22:47:10 GMT
I actually like this. Nicely done. However, it's just an ideological dispute, but I believe the 5th clause should be removed. Leadership and hierarchy shouldn't be forced upon, persay, an Anarchist party.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2015 23:03:39 GMT
I actually like this. Nicely done. However, it's just an ideological dispute, but I believe the 5th clause should be removed. Leadership and hierarchy shouldn't be forced upon, persay, an Anarchist party. I agree. Could it instead be changed to a stipulation requiring each party to have a Parliamentary Liaison? Is the purpose to have someone who can account for the party in Parliament, or enforce internal structure? If the former, I think a liaison-type position could work. |
|
|
|
Post by Markotovia on Apr 16, 2015 23:41:02 GMT
I actually like this. Nicely done. However, it's just an ideological dispute, but I believe the 5th clause should be removed. Leadership and hierarchy shouldn't be forced upon, persay, an Anarchist party. I understand where your coming from. I'll change it so that it requires one or more nations to be accountable for organizing inter-party cooperation. Do you endorse? |
|
|
|
Post by Acro on Apr 17, 2015 0:15:20 GMT
As long as it doesnt give them democracy blocking power I Endorse Not sure what you mean? I mean in the sense of what the current Constitutional Ammendment will do, I like the bill because it doesnt do that  |
|
|
|
Post by Markotovia on Apr 17, 2015 0:26:28 GMT
I mean in the sense of what the current Constitutional Ammendment will do, I like the bill because it doesnt do that Oh ya this was just meant as a way to make sure Parties are kept fair. The main reason I made this bill was because many of the existing parties have members who have long since left the CFN and others aren't even registered citizens. So this bill will clean things up |
|
|
|
Post by Ile-Savoir on Apr 17, 2015 0:49:25 GMT
ENDORSED
|
|
|
|
Post by AOS on Apr 18, 2015 15:30:59 GMT
I endorse.
|
|
