|
|
Post by Unfallious on Mar 11, 2015 19:49:12 GMT
I was fixing your example. Your both bias against this bill, you more so since you've in fact denounced it. Surely an independent commission will be set up? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Show_trialNo, actually, because neither one of us are biased. We're both rightly Members of Parliament, and we have no association that would bias us. We don't like the bill because of it's legality. I actually was going to endorse it until I read the latter portion. Also, this isn't a trial. It's judicial review. Also also, you can't replace a Supreme Court Justice. So suddenly just because you're a justice you're deemed to have a better ability to read a set a words on a page? Because from where I'm sitting you can't seem to understand that the constitution allows this bill. I've been in this region the same amount of time as you. I've read the constitution more than once. I understand how to interpret it. Holding some sham 'review' (Review meaning that I'll likely not be able to defend my own bill) in which the verdict is decided before even beginning over the legality of something that is already clearly legal is ludicrous. As for association 1) We've had run ins before over our ideological and party differences. 2) We've had a public argument over the RMB very recently. 3) You've expressed your dismay at party involvement in regional politics (especially mine) many times. |
|
|
|
Post by Vladovaskia on Mar 11, 2015 20:02:35 GMT
I am no longer going to debate you. I made a mistake by continuing to post after I already I wouldn't. I've told you all that could be said. If you have a question about the law, please ask, because the law does not run off of assumptions.
|
|
|
|
Post by Acro on Mar 11, 2015 21:14:55 GMT
I am rescinding my Support and denouncing until it can be looked at under the Supreme Court
|
|
|
|
Post by Everestopia on Mar 11, 2015 22:40:38 GMT
Due to possible legal complications that might have arisen regrading this bill, I hereby request the Chief Justice call for this bill to go under Judical Review.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vista Major on Mar 11, 2015 22:48:52 GMT
Due to possible legal complications that might have arisen regrading this bill, I hereby request the Chief Justice call for this bill to go under Judical Review. |
|
Ruclax
Court Administrator
Posts: 328 
WA Member: Yes
CFN Political Party: Liberal Party
|
Post by Ruclax on Mar 11, 2015 22:53:25 GMT
Due to possible legal complications that might have arisen regrading this bill, I hereby request the Chief Justice call for this bill to go under Judical Review. Well....thanks the heavens. |
|
|
|
Post by Everestopia on Mar 11, 2015 22:53:31 GMT
Due to possible legal complications that might have arisen regrading this bill, I hereby request the Chief Justice call for this bill to go under Judical Review. Indeed I am, after reading through every comment on this bill. I'd rather have the bill checked, to make sure it is not going to cause a legal issue. |
|
Ruclax
Court Administrator
Posts: 328
WA Member: Yes
CFN Political Party: Liberal Party
|
Post by Ruclax on Mar 11, 2015 22:55:06 GMT
Good choice Chancellor Everestopia.
Because you can be sure if passed as is it will.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladovaskia on Mar 11, 2015 22:56:31 GMT
Due to possible legal complications that might have arisen regrading this bill, I hereby request the Chief Justice call for this bill to go under Judical Review. Your Special Victims Unit can't help you now, Olivia. I will create a thread in the Judicial Branch's part of the forums, and I will begin calling all Justices for review over the bill as soon as possible. We will announce our decision and statement when it is made. |
|
|
|
Post by Unfallious on Mar 11, 2015 23:06:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Vista Major on Mar 11, 2015 23:22:32 GMT
Indeed I am, after reading through every comment on this bill. I'd rather have the bill checked, to make sure it is not going to cause a legal issue. *sigh* It may be for the best. I don't want a repeat of CAPO. |
|
|
|
Post by Vladovaskia on Mar 12, 2015 5:18:52 GMT
This bill has been found UNCONSTITUTIONAL by the Supreme Court, and has been removed from Parliament. Any immediate bills sprung up in similarity to this bill shall face a similar fate.
For more information, visit the Supreme Court board for votes and the majority statement.
|
|
|
|
Post by Unfallious on Mar 12, 2015 16:13:11 GMT
What a surprise.
Thank you for your uncompromising and unbiased opinion, Vlad.
|
|
