|
|
Post by Sulania on Mar 5, 2015 23:15:41 GMT
I hereby DENOUNCE this bill on the grounds that the same proposal practically already exists. I understand but this is more of an amendment to that bill. I want to get rid of the censure thing because if a Minister is not acting well it should be either you're in or out. If many think the Minister is not doing well, having a statement of disapproval is not really doing anything to fix the issue. Once again this is an amendment to the PPA. Not a new bill Which I don't agree with. It will fix the problem if said guy wants to get reelected. He will try harder at his job because we let him know that he is doing poorly and we will not vote for him on his current course. Whether your in or out should be a matter of two things. If you're doing so terribly, than you get kicked out. This is if you have a 0%-40% approval (Wide disapproval), people obviously don't think you're doing your job right and a reelection I can get behind. However if he's in the moderate disapproval range of 40%-50%, then we give him a notice that we won't reelect him because he has our disapproval and he can either do harder to try getting reelected or he can forget about getting reelected next term. However I can't get behind kicking someone out of office for having anything over 50% which would show that he at least has an even amount of approval throughout the region. Again, this is my opinion though. |
|
|
|
Post by Vista Major on Mar 6, 2015 4:20:16 GMT
ABSTAIN
I have conflicting feelings about this proposal.
|
|
|
|
Post by COLDR on Mar 6, 2015 20:20:06 GMT
Denounced
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladovaskia on Mar 7, 2015 17:52:50 GMT
I denounce this bill, as like Sul has said, there's already similar acting legislation, and I see a few flaws that I don't like: The 60% pass or fail thing leaves a 20% gap that has no instruction on what to do if a Minister is within it. The Chief Justice should not be grouped with the Cabinet, as that position follows a completely separate election format and term. Those are just a few, but I doubt either way I'll change to endorsing this bill, as there's already legislation I agree with. But, good job on the bill Mark. It has its flaws, but for the most part it is well-written. And i found this in the Constitution: 3. The Chief Justice will be voted upon publicly by all registered citizens during the same election period as all other elected officials, every 2 months.That is outdated. I need to spend today updating the Constitution. |
|
|
|
Post by Jaslandia on Mar 10, 2015 23:19:08 GMT
I believe our current Vote of Confidence system is sufficient, therefore, I hereby denounce this bill.,
|
|
|
|
Post by Acro on Mar 10, 2015 23:48:34 GMT
Denounced
|
|
|
|
Post by Sulania on Mar 12, 2015 1:05:58 GMT
Voting has ended
With a 33% approval rating, this bill is void and will not be passed into law.
|
|
